The three of them were in trouble.
Hello Rabbi Michi,
My neighbor wants to give up a seventh-day wine in front of three witnesses. And she gave up in front of her adult son and two neighbors, but now I thought that her son probably isn't a kosher witness.
A Kosher and Happy Passover
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
0 Answers
It's not bad. It's promiscuous and everything is fine.
Here is a brief explanation:
Conditions have been divided over how many times one must renounce. According to the halachah, rabbis such as Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi say that one is sufficient, while rabbis have ruled that one must renounce before three.
A. It is necessary to discuss whether the three should be qualified to deliberate (this is probably a jury and not witnesses. For witnesses, two is sufficient). From the perspective of this, this should be likened to the dissolution of vows, which can also be done in front of relatives, since there is no legal decision made here by this panel.
on. What is the ruling retrospectively when the person abandoned one or two people? It is likely that the abandonment occurred (certainly to two people), and therefore it is no longer necessary and in fact impossible to abandon again.
third. Furthermore, even in the opinion of Rival, there are jurists who said that when abandoning something in order to avoid a prohibition, one person is sufficient. And some ruled that in the case of movables, one is sufficient. Our case is abandoning something in order to avoid a prohibition.
Everything is fine. Happy Kosher Holiday,
Michi
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
השאר תגובה
Please login or Register to submit your answer