Being in an immodest place
I saw what you wrote regarding the issue of “Ika Darka Achrina” and “Lika Darka Achrina” and your conclusion is as in Pesach, “It is not possible and not from a direction” in relation to all the laws of walking through immodest places, as well as regarding other things (I did not understand why one should reach “It is not possible and not from a direction”, because there the Rambam ruled that even “It is possible and not from a direction” is permissible).
What do you think about staying in an immodest place? There is a distinction between going to a certain place and staying there.
It’s also a wonder that today, while many of the conservative public are cautious and strict about going to immodest places on the street, they also go to restaurants where there is almost no chance that there won’t be a patch of exposed pubic hair.
thanks
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Did you write at the end? I would love to see the answer. Thank you.
See column 487: https://mikyab.net/posts/76708
I don't see a reference to the division I asked about staying in a place with burglaries.
I answered it here.
I don't see a forgiving answer, help me understand.
How is it permissible to sit in a restaurant where there is a naked woman, because from the issue of Passover, one can learn in principle only about passing by in an immodest place, but staying can be a problem (and yes, this is also a fairly logical and intuitive distinction).
I don't understand where you got the distinction between passing through and staying. If it is forbidden, then passing through is also forbidden. You should understand that this is not a permit for any purpose, because then there would be room to discuss how far they allowed. There is simply no prohibition. By the way, Ba'er Mayim Chaim talks about staying.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
