Choosing a profitable opinion
Hi Miki. I wanted to ask what you think. Suppose that on a certain question such as the survival of the soul after death, I have no sufficient evidence or reasons one way or the other. And suppose that believing in the survival of the soul would make my life today better or more moral. Is it legitimate to choose one opinion from among the options out of purposiveness and not out of a logical conclusion? Is that possible? Is it intellectually correct?
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Thanks for the response.
Just want to clarify. I'm not talking about adopting an opinion that I don't believe in, but rather that I'm skeptical about it and don't have convincing proof for one side. Why not include in the set of considerations the implications of life in light of that opinion.
Of course, even after adopting the opinion, if you ask me if I'm convinced that this is the truth, the answer will be negative, but this is the opinion that I chose to live by. (You can see this as a type of leadership, but this is not behavior that contradicts reality in my opinion, but rather a decision on a question that I don't have an informed decision on)
I understood all of this, and I answered it.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer