Did they kill Jesus?
The late Supreme Court Justice Haim Cohen
He proved that it was not the sages of Israel who sentenced him to death.
After all, there is no discussion at night, nor on Shabbat and Yom Kippur, nor according to his own confession, and this blasphemer is so great that he curses by name, and he is only called a hero, and a strange definition of the Son of God is not blasphemy, and so is everyone guilty and innocent. And perhaps a few more Sanhedrin politicians.
question:
A. Achan was killed by Kaoru according to his own confession.
on. Is it possible that before they arranged (wrote?): these Mishnayim, these Dinas were not practiced?
(And the Sanhedrin later only enacted these rules)
C. Apparently this was a Sadducean and not a Pharisee (or at least mixed, as in the case of the two disciples of Jesus who were saved from the situation in the Sanhedrin)
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
A correction was added to the question in another thread:
A big correction.
So that there is no mistake, 2015.
Whoever killed Jesus and hung the sign here, the King of the Jews, was killed, of course, by the Romans. The Jews did not.
That is not what I meant to ask.
He was killed and should not have continued to live even for a second in the eyes of the Romans because they recognized in him a potential risk to their rule because he called for honesty and fairness, that was definitely more than enough for the government not to leave its head on him for even a minute longer.
The question was about the Sanhedrin that sentenced him to death and some of the evidence of the Supreme Judge, H. Cohen, the late, only.
Is it possible that he was at least partly a Pharisee [as with his disciples, at least 1 of whom cried out to the Pharisee judges, "Please, Pharisee son of Pharisee," and created chaos in the mixed Sanhedrin and thus escaped. And the second in the Pharisee laws [Chazal] did not deserve death] and the laws that were enacted [or written] about 200 years later in the Mishnah and later in the Talmud, did not apply then at the time of Jesus' trial?
Or were they simply a Sadducean Sanhedrin, and they have no problem with judgment at night or on Shabbat or on the Sabbath, and that a person does not consider himself wicked, and the definition of a blasphemer can be more general, and so is all guilty and not even in the literal sense of the Scriptures.
So according to their conduct, he certainly deserves death.
The question is only about the discussion in the Sanhedrin of Jesus' trial, of course, and not about the execution, which was clearly the Romans.
And the Mishnah did not move from its place.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
