From one does not come many.
peace,
The Maharal in the book “Netzah Yisrael” Chapter 3 raises the question of how there is a complex world, and from one does not come plurality? And he makes the excuse that something called “Begin” was created, and then on top of it, other complex things were created that complete it. Does the Rabbi understand the excuse?
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
By the way, I don't understand the problem either.
True, the question is not that clear either. In general, the Harald has all sorts of assumptions from which it is not clear what logical system they are drawn. For example, "a clear example of the obligation of Torah from heaven" because it must be that the halul is arranged under the halul. (Tiferet Yisrael, Chapter 17). And who said that the halul wants the halul to have rules about what to do? Maybe it wants him to do a rule that comes to his mind? And many other accounts in the Harald that are not clear how his logical inference works.
Speaking of Daniel Torgman in one of the questions here,
I think he talks about this Maharl in one of his articles. But I don't remember if he went into it much.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
