Identity = hypocrisy

They sold their principles for popularity. How did they go from "the state is not responsible for welfare" to supporters of requiring private businesses to be accessible, a law with a socialist-fascist flavor?

I'm just missing something here: Nazi, pagan, Stalinist, Maoist, idolatry, incest and bloodshed. But it's not too late, I can add more.

Wait, isn't a law that forbids me from opening a law firm on the second floor without an elevator socialist? Adding the description fascist may be less clear, but I meant the disproportionate imposition of the worldview of the general public on the individual.
This is a complete reversal of the ideology of identity in order to garner votes. It turns out that this is just another opportunistic party like all the others.

Dear Rabbi Levi. First, take a breath, think a little, and then write. Maybe it will make more sense. Firmness is no substitute for arguments and thinking.
Here are some points to think about:
1. Imposing worldviews does not necessarily contradict capitalism. The capitalists in the US are in favor of imposing a ban on abortion. They are in favor of imposing different national views. Feiglin himself supports imposing national and Jewish worldviews, so what did you get at him specifically about law firms.
2. Even if there were a contradiction between imposing a worldview and capitalism, opening a law firm without an elevator is not a question of worldview.
3. What about prohibiting monopolies (restrictive arrangements)? This is state coercion on the free market, and almost every capitalist in the world supports it (actually, mainly capitalists support it).
4. There is a rational capitalism that favors state intervention when there are market failures (such as monopolies). And the rationale is that this capitalism is based on the invisible hand as a substitute for state centralism. But when there are problems that the invisible hand will not solve (such as offices accessible to the disabled), there is room for state intervention even if you are a capitalist.
5. In general, capitalism is not a religious doctrine. A loyal capitalist is allowed to deviate from it when he sees it is right to do so. There is no reason to attack him as an infidel, especially if he does so. Or are you in favor of imposing your religious beliefs in capitalism on the public?…