Neo-Darwinism

I have seen several lectures by Dawkins and his fellow neo-Darwinists.
Do Dickens’ claims really hold water?
I get the impression that he has become a reflection of the thing he is fighting against.
He often sounds like an “atheist fundamentalist” if it’s even possible that he’s fighting religious fundamentalism (and religiosity in general).
I saw in one of his lectures that the conclusion he reached was that religion leads to ignorance and wars, but I can logically show that secular national movements, secular Marxist movements, etc. also lead to exactly the same result, not to mention that Marx’s supporters claimed that Marx’s claims were “scientific” socialism, and the Nazis said that the Jewish “race” was inferior and proved this by “scientific” means, all without God.
 
What do you think about the phenomenon in general and Dawkins in particular, and have people who place science above all else and try with all their might to humiliate religion actually created their own religion without even noticing?