New on the site: Michi-bot. An intelligent assistant based on the writings of Rabbi Michael Avraham.

Not in general

שו”תNot in general
asked 5 years ago

Shalu’ Rabbi
Attached here is this answer, following my search for a source for why there is no lookup for the lav in general, in the KM the HM already assumes that we know this (and it seems from it that it is because the lav is a blockage like the HM in Pesachim 11) but the HM does not provide a neat source for this as in most cases in the HM of studying a source for some matter of ( “menah” etc.) I wanted to know what the rabbi thinks about the phi that the Habanez wanted to burn
And maybe the Rabbi can help me with the source.
And so the Gamma in the book of Makot on page 23 says that the Law of God is about the loss of the name of God, and we learn this from the verse: “You shall not do this to the Lord,” etc., and this ruling was brought up in the Rambam in the Law of the Foundations of the Torah, 6:1, 17, and why this is not true in general.
And why is that not true in general?
Avni Nezer, the son of the late C. Tsev, wrote: “The first day of the week, the day of truth and justice, for the sake of the people of Sachchav.”
In honor of the Abraham, according to his midrash, the son of a certain man,
His letter reached me. And it is clear that one reading comes out for several reasons, both in the laws of the 20th century, but in such a way that it is not reasonable to study one more than this, therefore both will come, since it is a mini-production. And so the language of the Shas in several places is that they are sound, and both will come …
But what occurred to you to say, H.E., that there is only one interpretation of truth. And this is a matter of no consequence, for in general there is no shadow of doubt. It cannot be said at all. And it is forbidden to hear it. And I am very sorry for your highness that you would go H.E. in such perverse ways. And I wanted to burn the letter for your honor. But I will wait until you speak again. And as for the health of your body, when your study is in the proper manner, the Torah will certainly be a healing to your muscles and a refreshment to your bones:

Leave a Reply

0 Answers
מיכי Staff answered 5 years ago

I don’t know the source. I’ve really wondered for some time why they don’t have a problem. The questioner’s claim is interesting, but really implausible. It’s not that in general there is no doubt but rather a collection of certain prohibitions. For example, in “You Shall Not Eat of Blood,” Maimonides lists a warning for a rebellious son. If everything was in doubt, he wouldn’t have listed this either. The rule is that none of the prohibitions have a problem, but they list one of them and no more.
Why is it necessary to burn letters because of this? You should ask the ABNZ about that.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button