New on the site: Michi-bot. An intelligent assistant based on the writings of Rabbi Michael Avraham.

Race and psychometrics

שו”תCategory: generalRace and psychometrics
asked 6 years ago

Hello Rabbi,
I am currently reading your book “True and Unstable.” In the sixth part of the book, you refer to the psychometric test, and insist that although the connection between success in the psychometric test and success in academic subjects is not absolute, this uncertain prediction is still better than analytical perfectionism. I certainly agree, and I think that universities have the right to accept the students they think have the highest chance of success.
On the other hand, I saw you write elsewhere that if a university doesn’t accept someone because of their skin color, it’s racism. I agree with that too. The point is, what happens if a study comes out that shows that people with green skin color are, on average, less successful as psychologists. Why isn’t it legitimate for a university to raise the bar for people with green skin color who want to be admitted to psychology studies?
Thank you, and have a good week.


Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

0 Answers
מיכי Staff answered 6 years ago
Such research is irrelevant. Each student must be examined individually, since there are talented and untalented students in every population, even if there are differences between the averages. If it is not possible to test, there may be justification for using a stereotype, as the army does in the KBA (although there is no justification there because they have the ability to test).

Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

אלי replied 6 years ago

What does it mean to “test a student for himself”? Why is a psychometric test a better test than a population/economic status test/gender test, etc. There are both talented and untalented people at all different levels of the psychometric test.
A person does not choose their level of intelligence just as they do not choose their skin color. Why is this a legitimate test, and this is not?

מיכי replied 6 years ago

See columns 226, 228.

אלי replied 6 years ago

Nice, I really liked it. It explains to me the difference between the statement “I don't know”, and the statement “I think there is a 50% probability”, which I always had a hard time distinguishing between.
Still, I would appreciate it if you could translate this to our case. Is relying on race a “legal” or “probabilistic” problem?
And why is relying on race more similar to the 99 out of 100 prisoners who attacked the guard, than relying on psychometric scores?
Thanks

מיכי replied 6 years ago

It can be explained in several ways. The simplest is that race is a random variable and has no intrinsic relationship to talent, but a psychometric test is a direct and objective test of the relevant variable (talent). Another angle: It is unreasonable not to give a chance to someone who belongs to a certain race by birth even if he is talented, but in psychometrics it is up to you. And race is similar to most common data (although not entirely).

Leave a Reply

Back to top button