New on the site: Michi-bot. An intelligent assistant based on the writings of Rabbi Michael Avraham.

Several questions in faith

שו”תCategory: faithSeveral questions in faith
asked 12 months ago

Hello Rabbi Michael, it is important for me to say that I very much connect with your rationality and I very much enjoy listening to you. I have 4 questions for you.

1. What do you think of Spinoza’s perception of God? Do you mean, from Spinoza’s perspective, what created the universe if not God? (As I understood it, he perceives the object as its own cause, meaning that the tree is its own cause. I didn’t understand what the logic in that was?)

2. And how was the Oral Torah also given at Mount Sinai? In my opinion, this does not make sense at all. Let’s say it was given, how did the entire people manage to remember it orally and pass it on word for word throughout the generations? And the same goes for the five books of the Torah. Do you think that some of the verses were compiled/written by humans? Because I perceive the entire Bible as a human creation.

3. And what is your general opinion of Spinoza as a philosopher?

4. And have you read Yuval Steinitz’s book “A Scientific Logical Missile to God and Back”? And if so, what do you think? Thanks!

PS I would be more than happy for you to do a podcast together.


Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

0 Answers
מיכי Staff answered 12 months ago
Happy to be happy. 1. In my opinion, his God is empty of content. To identify God with the whole of creation is atheism. Parallel to the Hasidic view that the reduction is not as simple as it seems. 2. What is given is the way of thinking and the ways of preaching and the interpretations of words. It is clear that the laws we have, almost all of which are Toshab’s, have developed over the generations. Regarding the Toshab’ka, it is possible that there are verses that were written later (such as the verses “to this very day”). Beyond that, it is certainly possible that the text was edited later. 3. I haven’t dealt with him. His ethics, from what I’ve read, seem like empty talk to me. 4. I read it many years ago. I can say in general that Steinitz is inaccurate in several places and there are holes in his arguments.

Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button