The debate with Yaron Yadan

In the debate, you argued that there are two different obligations that stem from a divine source, one moral and the other halakhic. And you also argued that if there is a dilemma between the two, if there is a clear ruling in the Torah, even if it does not feel morally right, you will choose the ruling of the Torah. (As an example, you gave the expulsion of a priest’s wife who was raped.)
The question is, do you continue this line of thinking with other clear prohibitions, for example, male sexual intercourse, or are you already going in another direction here where you excuse what is written in the Torah by the Torah Shevap?