The Rabbi’s Worldview

In light of two of the last threads..
I would be happy if you would elaborate on this in an orderly manner. If I understood correctly, the Rabbi understands that A. There is no divine intervention today. B. There is no necessity for redemption. C. There is no necessity for reward and punishment (and if I understand correctly, for life after death as well). D. As a derivative of this or regardless, the Rabbi believes that the reason for observing the commandments is because it is a value to observe the Creator’s will and we observe it as a value. E. There is a rational reason to observe values.

1. It seems puzzling to me that God, who was involved in the lives of the generation of the Exodus down to the smallest level of resolution (even though the revelations were to individuals, He speaks in them about every detail) where they would eat, where they would sleep, etc., suddenly decided to stop interfering in His world, and although I agree that not every leaf that falls and every person who misses a bus is divine providence… but to say that even things related to the entire Jewish people, the Holocaust, the establishment of the state, and now the coronavirus, all of this is happening without Him even noticing?
2. God gave the Torah and commandments because… Messiah is irrelevant… Reward and punishment do not belong… For values? It is also not reasonable, since He commands to punish the transgressors of his word from death in the temple to cutting off and death at the hands of heaven. If it is only a value, why punish? Besides, in my opinion, here is a tendency shown. If He has an interest in punishing (and I hope that the Rabbi agrees that cutting off and so on is also relevant today), this shows divine intervention in human life.
3. In the question discussed here, whether the commandments are values, why should they be observed, the rabbi answered that it is altruism and that the rabbi understands that it is something basic in humans that some feel. The question is whether it is a superficial emotion, and then it can be said that those who feel it will observe the Torah and the daily commandments, or is there some rational insight here that can be proven logically? Especially since the opposing side, which claims that altruism is due to an interest in avoiding unpleasant feelings (perhaps I am wrong in calling it altruism..), offers a logical explanation (and I personally also believe in it).
4. The Rabbi wrote regarding altruism (on column 120):

[3] I would like to emphasize that the term altruism here does not describe a moral attitude but rather a description of how humans act. It is not a norm but a factual description of how humans act. The altruist believes that sometimes humans act out of value and without reward or self-interest.
 
This means that there is behavior that occurs because of a value, and let’s assume that this is true, how does it apply to religious obligations where I must fulfill them even if it doesn’t come to me spontaneously like in altruism, and I also don’t have the strength or will, or I see any value in the mitzvah. But the rabbi is saying that there really is no reason to keep mitzvahs that I don’t feel value in or that I don’t feel like doing right now, because the rabbi is only presenting an explanation here of why sometimes people will keep them because of a value, but not as a reason that would give permanent and global validity and oblige me to keep them.
PS: What is the Rabbi’s view regarding the reliability of texts from the prophets?