The third identity in the context of recruitment
On the subject of the third identity, the rabbi reiterated that the watershed line is on modernity, not Zionism.
And the rabbi claimed that the debate about Zionism is anachronistic.
Is the rabbi changing his mind today? After all, there is one community here that sacrifices itself for the state and for its people, and a second community that seems to think the only reason they are here is convenience.
Isn’t that much more significant than arguments about religion?
Much more significant to me is whether there will be an exemption for the ultra-Orthodox and a few other issues related to parasitism.
Will the Rabbinate have a monopoly on kashrut and marriage?
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
So why do the mustards themselves enlist?
You're basically claiming that the mustards also agree with the haredim that enlisting is forbidden for fear of spoilage
It's just that the mustards think that this fear doesn't exist for themselves?
Indeed, for them it is less present. But the question is whether spoilage is an exemption? They agree on that. The question is, do you oppose the instruction of the Haredim not to enlist? Absolutely not. It is not for nothing that their representatives support the law in the Knesset and their rabbis do not join the protests and calls for the Haredim to enlist.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
