What is your opinion on Tanakh?
The subject is trite – and yet – I have a hard time understanding why the rabbi does not see educational value in studying the Tanakh. It is true that new things are not learned from it, because if so, then I inserted my opinions into the text and did not draw from it. But I ask, why not see this as studying the things “whose truth is obvious to all, and yet the hidden is very common and the forgotten is widespread”, as one can say about unnecessary books of morality and faith, but in the end, studying Torah is not just acquiring knowledge, but instilling true values in a person. Why is studying the Tanakh as it is and according to Chazal, which has so many values and faith in God, not studying Torah?
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Thanks for the answer!
A. This is exactly the point, it has not disappeared, it is known to all, and even the most ‘contrary to what you have proven, it is obvious to all, so the disappearance of them is very common and the forgetting is great’.
B. Is internalizing and educating in such important and basic things not Torah study? It seems to me just semantics, yes study, no study, in the end do you agree that it is important to study it? Internalize, of course?
You don't have to be a genius to see what kind of distortion comes out of the Haredi public that is immersed in ’study’ but has forgotten the most basic things in Torah. It is simply no less important to engage in these basic things.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
