Refining a previously asked question

This is simply another version of the question of “How does the fact that everything is known from heaven fit in with free will?”
The girl describes her understanding of Libet's findings – that an electrical action has already taken place in the brain before the motor action as follows: “I can understand/accept that I don't know what my next thought will be – Of course, the fact that it has already happened/predetermined – I simply can't grasp that”
That's exactly my question… How do you reconcile this contradiction
Of course – This is a very philosophical question and perhaps – according to you – she cried non-specifically… But in any case… It doesn't hurt to ask

(Pushed, sorry.
Calibrations are probably a synonym for the ’vaccination’ recommended here: https://tinyurl.com/yatdtruj

“I just suggest that you watch the lecture I sent you, and try to examine my words when you read these essays. It is a recommended vaccination that gives you directions for checking what you are reading”.)

Yael,
I don't understand this strange and convoluted formulation. If you mean the banal question about knowledge and choice, what's the point of all these convolutions? It's been discussed to the point of exhaustion and I don't see what needs to be added about it. And I also don't understand what it has to do with Libet. If you want to hear my opinion on this question, listen to the Free Choice3 lesson I gave just this morning. A Zoom recording of it will be uploaded to the website shortly. There I explain it in detail.

And let's be honest,
When there is a special need, there is value in getting a vaccine. But if someone sees a book that they find interesting, there is no reason to insist on getting a vaccine before reading it. Let them read it and then we can discuss it.