Right-wing professor Fine

I know a little. They sent me his materials (and also a film about him being a Sirovnik, which inspires great appreciation for his personality). What I read seemed quite similar to some of my arguments. I disagreed with some points and the way they were presented, but it was definitely interesting and worth reading. As for his world-renowned reputation as a scientist, I don’t know. What I do know is that the religious world, and the ultra-Orthodox in particular, has a tendency to treat every scientific researcher as a world-renowned scientist (who has published “twenty international papers” and participated as a speaker at various conferences abroad, which is typical of any ordinary academic). But specifically about him, I really don’t know. And one more thing, it seems to me that what sets him apart is his being religious, and less his being right-wing. But beyond that, the very fact of referring to him as a “right-wing professor” is insulting and full of feelings of inferiority, and also irrelevant. The question is what is the nature of his reasons and arguments, not whether he is “right-wing” (this is the gist of my last column, 362).