Scientific consensus regarding Corona

It's easiest to take incompetent straw men to defend the position and thus ridicule.

I would like to see one day someone from the ”new science” or from the intellectuals of the nuisance of ignorance who would agree to a debate against Prof. Eyal Shahar, Prof. Kimron or Dr. Rafael Zioni.

Brainwashing 101

1. As far as I remember, the rabbi dismissed with a wave of the hand and contempt the opinion of those who disagree with the position of the medical establishment, happy to see that the position currently is “Respect every reasoned position”

And if Lior Schlein, who makes a living as a clown, ridiculed Professor Les – What will the mosses on the wall say….

2. It is hard to believe that it will happen – There is a long-standing and powerful dictatorship that firmly silences those who do not align with the medical establishment and the pharmaceutical companies

And on this occasion I highly recommend reading the excellent book “Turtles All the Way Down” which deals very thoroughly with the safety of vaccines (written even before the Corona)

1. I did not dismiss those who disagree with the medical establishment. At most, I dismissed their stupid claims. But I certainly have general confidence in science and its way of conducting itself. Even if there are mistakes in the short term, they are corrected in the long term, and that works better, Chairman, than any other way I know, certainly the conspiracy methods that are usually really stupid. Anyway, if I made you happy – and that was my reward.
2. To ridicule the idiot and liar Les, you don't even have to make a living as a clown. He does the work himself.

Thanks for the quick response and the joy?

You wrote – “I have general trust in science and its conduct”

In the book I recommended, he calls this innocent belief the “Myth of Pure Science”

Let's focus on Corona – Do you really think that the scientists and doctors involved in developing Corona vaccines are working with dedication and complete cleanliness of hands solely for the sake of heaven and their goal is one – to bring relief to humanity in danger?

Isn't there a situation where financial considerations are interspersed here and there? After all, the vaccine is produced by a business company that aims to make a profit, and marketed by a medical establishment that has been doing so for decades and whose clear interest is that there will be no doubt about the product

And if the answer to my question about the purity of the intentions of Pfizer and Big Pharma representatives is positive – Why is it that when they come to a side that opposes the medical establishment, their myth disappears in a cloud of smoke and they become delusional by default, and their opinions are stupid??
I have not found anywhere that you address the reasoned opinions of the media experts on Corona, for example

Perhaps the massive media and institutional backing (even Lior Schlein says so…) somewhat dulls judgment and critical thinking?

Alex, I understand that you have full faith in the myth of the pure book. So what if he writes?
I argue that you are generalizing the entire world of science under one heading. Since it is decentralized and has various factors, I do not accept your conspiratorial thesis. Pfizer certainly has an economic interest, but there are regulatory bodies whose job it is to make sure that this does not harm the quality of the treatment/product, and there are many independent laboratories and academics who test them. There are always opposing voices, and this is part of scientific pluralism, and yet the scientific world as a whole works very well. The best there is. Certainly more than a few esoteric voices who criticize it. This does not mean that they are never right, but they are usually wrong.
I did not write anywhere that all opponents of vaccines are delusional. I said that there are a very large number of delusional people among them (the vast majority, in my opinion). I do not dismiss an argument just because it is against the scientific position, but I certainly treat it with great skepticism. I will only dismiss it when I think it is illogical. Many arguments I have seen from opponents of vaccines are illogical, and even just stubborn and fact-denying. That does not mean that they are all like that, and each argument should be heard and examined on its own merits.
In any case, it is clear to me that vaccines are beneficial and that opposition to them is stupid. The arguments I have seen there are illogical and make a big deal out of a mouse. There are always risks of one kind or another. Pointing out them means nothing.
It seems to me that if there is anyone here whose criticality is obscured by public discourse and made one-sided and biased, it is not me. But as I said, maybe I am biased in that too.