Skull.it

I have long wondered what progressive parents do when something is born to them. They cannot say we have a boy or a girl, they cannot talk, neither about the baby nor about the baby girl, because it is forbidden to infer its gender. So until the child reaches the age of 8 and decides for himself whether it is a boy or a girl, the parents do not know whether they have a boy or a girl.
How do they deal with this?
They also cannot buy him clothes and utensils in blue rather than pink, for the same reason. Apparently they dress him only in gray.
But the big problem is circumcision, for those of them who are strict about it.
After all, if it turns out that it is a female, I will circumcise him retroactively, since there was no room for a circumcision, and what do they actually do when the newborn reaches the age of 8 days?
And perhaps it is said that the progressive Sanhedrin requires ‘eight days’ – Eight years, because in the Torah there are days that are two years.
Therefore, in order to perform a circumcision, two conditions are required: A. The taxpayer reaches the age of 8 and decides that he is male. B. There is something to circumcise.
If he decided that he was male but there is nothing to circumcise, or there is something to circumcise but he decided that he was female, there is no need to perform a circumcision. And so on.

Who said that a covenant is only for males (if there is such a thing as a covenant for males at all)? A covenant is for people who have something to say.

Golem, androgynous is considered only a doubtful word.

It is stated in the Torah:
Genesis Chapter 17, 10
Every male among you shall be circumcised

It seems that what is your concern for him, since if he chooses to be male – then we have commanded him to be circumcised, and if he chooses to be female – then it is not appropriate for her to have a foreskin.

However, one should be satisfied with whether it is permissible to recite a blessing upon circumcision and circumcision on Shabbat, since only in the future will it be determined retrospectively whether he is commanded to circumcise, and according to the Torah, it is permanent, as there is no choice, and therefore it seems that his circumcision should be postponed to a weekday and circumcision without a blessing. And that is what I wrote.

With blessings, the multi-gendered Rabbi of the Future Progressive

However, one should also discuss his circumcision on a weekday, since it is possible that the rabbi will choose to consider this day as Shabbat, and it is found that there is a “doubt of desecration of Shabbat” here, and perhaps one should be lenient because of the “doubt of spicah for acceptance”, since perhaps he is male and the rabbi is female, so it is a weekday. And then

And maybe the circumcision should be postponed until he grows up, because if he chooses to be a woman, then it is said that a woman has the right to her body and cannot be circumcised without her consent 🙂

With blessings, Rahar”m Dqqf”p