New on the site: Michi-bot. An intelligent assistant based on the writings of Rabbi Michael Avraham.

Permission to watch films with indecent scenes

שו”תCategory: HalachaPermission to watch films with indecent scenes
asked 3 years ago

Hello Rabbi,
A few years ago (in the 2018 issue of Tzohar, https://www.tzohar.org.il/wp-content/uploads/membet.pdf, p. 71) Rabbi Avraham Stav published an article permitting the viewing of films that contain immodest scenes (up to a certain level, and to a certain amount) provided that the viewer closes his eyes.
Is the Rabbi familiar with the issue? What is the Rabbi’s opinion on the matter?
I would like to point out that the question is purely halakhic, and not an ideological or educational one about watching such films (like the article).
thanks

Leave a Reply

0 Answers
מיכי Staff answered 3 years ago

Completely agree. And I’m not even sure we should close our eyes (the KH discusses this in Be’er Mayim Chaim). I wrote about it here on the site.
Now I found it here: https://mikyab.net/%D7%A9%D7%95%D7%AA/%D7%A1%D7%A8%D7%98%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%A2%D7%9D-%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%9C%D7%90-%D7%A6%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%A2%D7%99%D7%9D

דביר replied 3 years ago

In Be'er Mayim Chaim, he concludes [by virtue of a contradiction from the Gemara in Pesachim] to be stricter in the prohibition of looking at incest.
So citing him as a source is a bit difficult…

דביר replied 3 years ago

Additionally, I would love to know how you resolve his question from the Gemara on Pesachim, which forced his schism that you seem to not accept.

מיכי Staff replied 3 years ago

Here I did not rely on him, but wrote that he discussed it. Indeed, in the link I gave it is implied that he himself permits, but maybe I was wrong about that, I really do not remember his conclusion there. It is also not very important to me.
As for the matter, in the Sugya in Pesachim it appears that if there is a second way, it is permissible. And the first ones there explain that if there is a second way, it means that the alternative path is a little more difficult. It is not a matter of rape. And the explanation of the matter is that when there is another path and you choose this path, it means that you intend a prohibition, and therefore it is not intentional and forbidden. But when the other path is slightly longer, then choosing the short path is not with the intention of a prohibition, but because it is short, in any case it does not intend and is permissible.
As far as I remember, the simple Sugya in B”B implies that one should close one's eyes (for the sake of one's soul), but from Pesachim it appears that one does not. I do not have time to go into this now, and I am planning a column on the matter in the future.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button