The reward of the Baha’i commandment is as follows:

Indeed, it appears there. But the Gemara still discusses why we should not assume that there was something here that offset this right. Although it concludes that it did not, and therefore it can be applied to any particular case. Therefore, the conclusion is that the reward of a mitzvah is a Baha’i Alma likha. The entire discussion there is quite questionable in its logic, of course. But to claim that Rabbi Yaakov disagrees with Riyoch is far-fetched. Of course, when there is a great difficulty, issues are disputed. In any case, the column brings Riyoch into line with the law, and I also don’t remember a commentator who writes that there is a dispute here. By the way, I now think that the Gemara’s statement that the commandment to give their wages alongside them is not binding on them somewhat contradicts the conclusion here that this is about the world. It should be strongly rejected.