intuition
The Rabbi in his lessons on faith always said that one can never trust an emotion and believe in God because of it. But on the other hand, the Rabbi said that a person can trust his intuition.
I would like to know what the main difference is between them?
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Intuition without testing is also a direct perception of the truth? That is, who said that the solution is really 8?
I understand that this is what you feel, but how can it also oblige someone who does not feel, since I believe that everyone has the way to believe in it?
I've written books about it. It's hard to go into detail here. Obviously, my intuition doesn't obligate you. But neither does my logic or observation. As far as I'm concerned, this is the truth (and it's not an emotion). The question of whether I think it's true and the question of how to convince someone else of it are different questions.
If you want to learn the Rabbinic method of intuition from the basics, which books should you read and in what order?
Offers the truth and not the unstable
The Rabbi wrote that my logic or observation does not bind you.
Doesn't the Rabbi think that logic does bind someone else?
If not, then how does it bind God?
It obliges you if you also agree that this is what logic says. But the fact that I think that is what logic says does not oblige you.
So why do you assume that God agrees with you?
Because if he doesn't agree, then he's wrong, and my assumption is that God doesn't make mistakes.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer