New on the site: Michi-bot. An intelligent assistant based on the writings of Rabbi Michael Avraham.

Difficult questions

שו”תCategory: generalDifficult questions
asked 1 year ago

Shalom Rabbi and Happy New Year
A. I thought I wanted to study and teach Gemara carefully, but recently I thought about it again. There are many things in the world that have a clearer and more tangible value for us: saving lives (medicine, the security system), mathematical or scientific contributions that translate into knowledge about the world and technological developments, improving people’s mental state and preventing suffering, and so on. What logic is there in preferring vague goals that are difficult to understand exactly to whom and in what way they contribute, such as the mitzvot, and in particular the study of Torah for its own sake, over these goals whose importance is much more tangible to me and of which I am more convinced? In other words, even if I observe the halakha, etc., what logic is there in choosing a life of Torah study over the other goals?
on. In studying the Gemara carefully, one spends a lot of time trying to reconcile all sorts of different laws in the same mitzvah with each other, and to create a complete and coherent picture of this mitzvah, when sometimes it simply feels like there really is no such coherent picture, and the Sages simply were not that consistent and orderly, and demanded from the verses various sermons that, if you calculate far enough ahead, do not reconcile one with the other. Isn’t trying to cram all these things together simply self-deception?
third. Continuing with the second, do you really believe in the divine nature of the Midot Hardash? I read your explanations in the trilogy, etc., but sometimes I feel like I’m just trying to convince myself of this, and that there’s really no chance that God revealed to the Sages any beginning of the Midot Hardash, but that they simply started them themselves, and that in fact this method just leads them to laws that are sometimes random and sometimes contradict each other, etc., and when we study Gemara we just take it upon ourselves to correct the complications they created with this method. Do you really believe that the Midot Hardash (or an initial version of them) was given at Sinai?
D. When I heard the shofar on Rosh Hashanah, I realized that I had heard so many vorts about what I was supposed to think about during the shofar, that in the end I thought of nothing. Even if we reduce all the nonsense, there are at least two main meanings that seem to contradict each other: A. Shofar as the kingdom of God B. Shofar as weeping/crying/prayer. How is it possible that in such a fundamental mitzvah for the holiday, we are not at all clear about what it is about? How is it possible to keep a mitzvah in this way? What goal is achieved by keeping a mitzvah like this without fulfilling the purpose of the mitzvah that is not clearly known to us?


Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

0 Answers
מיכי Staff answered 1 year ago
A. You assume that worthy goals are only something that helps people and the world. But that is a mistake. I will illustrate this through my favorite story about the poor Chinese man. He was given two pennies and used them to buy a slice of bread and a flower. They asked him why he didn’t buy two slices of bread, and he explained: I bought the coal to live and the flower to have something to live for. It is very puzzling to perceive helping people as the purpose of life and the purpose of creation. After you help them, they will live well and society will be in order. But why do they need to live well and society to be in order? Why do people and society themselves exist? B. The question is too general. Therefore, I can only comment generally. If you think that the Sages were just playing, then indeed there is no point in the whole game. You have lost faith in the system. But that is really unlikely. Why invest so much energy in such games? What is their purpose? Therefore, it is more likely that they did try to reach the truth as best they could. They were human and could certainly make mistakes. We can try and organize their words in the best possible way, and hope that this is indeed the intention. If you have an alternative that seems more credible to you, perhaps it is really worth doing it. I do not see such a thing. Indeed, there is no need to overdo the rape for the sake of coherence. When there is a contradiction and there is no good settlement, you must decide which side of the contradiction you are on. Unreliable chatter is not the truth and it is wrong to engage in them. Just keep in mind that sometimes an analysis of positions and claims leads to a coherent picture that the speaker himself was not aware of, and it is still a correct interpretation. You can search here for the dispute between the Remnants of Fire and Rabbi Yehoshua Hutner regarding Rabbi Chaim and the Maimonides and my discussions around it. C. As above. Very unlikely. Much more logical and also consistent with the facts, is that the measurements were given at Sinai in the Julian way and were conceptualized and elaborated upon over the generations. D. Don’t think about anything and ignore the worts. The worts are good for the seven blessings and for kiddush on Shabbat in the synagogue with the herring. You have to intend to do your duty. That’s all.

Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

שואל replied 1 year ago

Thanks for the answers
Regarding A, I think I was misunderstood. There are goals that are more understandable to me, regardless of the help. The beauty of art or music, or the discovery of the truth about the world through science, as well as the goals of causing pleasure or preventing suffering, are goals whose importance I understand very intuitively (in my mind), much more than the goals of the mitzvot, and certainly than the goal of studying Torah. Doesn't it make more sense, then, to engage in them and give less space to the mitzvot and studying Torah as a central concern?

Regarding D, what logic is there in the mitzvot of blowing the shofar if we don't understand anything about it beyond the action itself? Do you really think that the purpose of the shofar is to "fix corrections" and that it has nothing to do with anything we are supposed to understand?

מיכי Staff replied 1 year ago

I see no connection between the question of understanding and the question of importance. If you believe in the Torah and its importance, then you must observe it regardless of understanding. And if you don't believe, then what is the whole discussion about?! Let's say you have some medical knowledge and you understand how a certain medicine works. Would you take it because of that instead of another medicine that the doctor recommends?

Leave a Reply

Back to top button