Does the creation of the choice of evil indicate a lack or evil?
As is known, one of the answers to the problem of the creation of evil by an omnipotent, all-good, and all-knowing God. In my opinion, the only plausible answer is that evil is necessary to create choice. The question is why create a choice that causes unnecessary suffering? The very fact of giving the possibility of choosing evil indicates that God is either not good or incomplete. Thank you very much. I would appreciate the answer.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The fact that God has an interest in me choosing and that justifies evil indicates; A. That God has an interest/interest = He is interested in something = He lacks something, meaning that God is not perfect and omnipotent, because He cannot satisfy this need for Himself without creating evil, which He clearly does not want.
B. It is more interesting to Him to satisfy this need/interest in us completely doing evil, meaning that the choice is more equal to completely doing evil, something that a perfectly good and even imperfect being would not do in life. What is the Rabbi's response?
My response is that he does have needs. Not necessarily in the same sense as we do, but a kind of completeness that needs to be filled.
See suggested explanation in column 170.
So the Rabbi agrees that he is not omnipotent? In addition, why does he not overcome his needs for the sake of good, as I would expect from perfect goodness?
I understand that you didn't read the column. Nor did you read my response above.
I read the answer above, but I haven't read the column yet.
I read the answer here, but not the column. In the answer you wrote here, you wrote that he has needs, so I asked why you think he is complete.
Who said he is complete? He has needs and part of his completeness is that we fulfill them. That is what I explained in the column.
But these are not needs that fulfill an interest but rather create completeness. Therefore, his demand to fulfill them is not something bad and lowly self-interested. That is what I answered here above.
I need to read the column. But aren't all of our needs aimed at achieving some kind of wholeness, at least temporarily? By the way, I think that if you have to bully people to be whole, that says something about you, doesn't it?
Indeed you need to. Your arguments here are irrelevant to the matter. No one said that all our needs are complete. On the contrary, those are his needs. Ours are not. And that doesn't indicate anything about him.
What is the difference between our needs and his? I say that our needs are a desire for perfection, man wants to be whole, to provide for a temporary or permanent deficiency, for this he fulfills his needs. And the Creator's needs are also a desire for perfection, as you wrote, just as we create evil, to fulfill needs is evil, so too is the Creator. By the way, it seems to me that the Ramchal writes that God is complete perfection, right? What do you think?
By the way, I read the article and you claimed there that God must create a process of self-improvement in order to be completely whole. Can't He create perfection without doing evil? Something that a good person, and certainly a perfectly good person, would never do in life.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer