Good afternoon, Your Honor,

The concrete question here should be, why does evolution – of all scientific theories – have an advantage. The statistical chance of the feasibility of evolution is zero, whereas if it were another scientific theory with such a low chance of being correct, it would be thrown into the trash as soon as it appeared?
The answer is: This is the only theory that can explain what surrounds us without the intervention of the Creator (ignoring the laws of nature, which the followers of evolution also avoid bringing into the equation, with the exception of Rabbi Michi).

I liked the assertiveness, especially when it came to complete nonsense.

I would have liked a little more attention to the substance of the arguments. Quirks (which are sometimes said to strengthen the teasing person's position in his own eyes), interesting ones can be found on other sites.

When there are arguments, I'll be happy to respond. I wasn't really teasing. My words were a dry description of your message: nonsense.

There were arguments here, on the surface no less good than those we often hear and read from you and much less convoluted. Their disadvantage is that they do not fit into the model you hold regarding evolution.
Incidentally: This view of mine on evolution and its place in science today has nothing to do with my religious views (which you do not know and which are also irrelevant).