New on the site: Michi-bot. An intelligent assistant based on the writings of Rabbi Michael Avraham.

Judaism? Why?

שו”תCategory: philosophyJudaism? Why?
asked 3 months ago

Dear Rabbi Dr. Lebens,
Hello!
I’m a young Jewish thinker with a deep passion for philosophy, currently studying computer science and physics, but always pulled back to the deepest existential questions.
I’m reaching out to you because I’m in the middle of a very personal and philosophical search. I’ve read some of your work, and I get the sense that you’re one of the few religious thinkers who engage seriously with the modern mind. That’s exactly what I need right now.
I am not an atheist. I believe in God, not as a leap of faith, but as a philosophical conclusion. Through reasoning, I’ve come to accept that there is a non-physical, necessary first cause’ a Creator. In that sense, I’m a deist.
But my central question, the one I can’t let go of, is this:
Did this God actually give us the Torah?
Is Judaism really the revealed truth? Or is it a human attempt to respond to the divine? Is there even any “truth” as a concept?
I want to be clear: I’m not searching for absolute certainty, I know that’s philosophically unattainable. What I’m seeking is the strongest probable case for belief. Not “true beyond doubt,” but “true enough to live by, to commit to with integrity.” That’s the kind of truth I’m after, grounded in reason, tested by doubt, and able to stand even in a probabilistic world.
Many people argue that Judaism must be true because it “works”, that its moral vision shaped the modern world.
But that’s not how I see it.
I think Judaism only “worked” in the moral sense because it seeded its values ​​into Christianity and Islam, which later spread those values ​​through empire and culture. The modern world sees certain Jewish ideas, like human dignity, rest, compassion, justice, as moral, because Judaism helped define what “moral” means in the first place.
In other words:
Judaism didn’t conform to existing morality, it created the moral framework that now makes it look “good.”
But if some other system had shaped history, say, Greco-Roman paganism, we might now consider cruelty in the arena or domination as moral too.
So saying “Judaism is moral” is circular, because the moral lens was built by Judaism itself (via Christianity and Islam)….
It “worked” because it got there first, not necessarily because it’s true.
And even within Judaism, not all mitzvot feel moral.
Some feel meaningful, beautiful, symbolic, but not moral.
Even when I understand their historical or ritual reasoning, I wouldn’t claim that something like tefillin or sha’atnez promotes justice or compassion. or any other moral value.
So if the truth claim depends on the moral perfection of the Torah – I don’t buy it.
Last but not least, I don’t trust the historical “Evidence”
I’ve also heard the argument that Judaism is historically unique, that the national revelation at Sinai is a once-in-history event, and that such a story could not have been fabricated.
But I don’t trust that logic either.
History is full of examples of entire nations believing in things that didn’t happen, or were later mythologized, like the Trojan War, or Romulus and Remus, or countless origin myths. Humans are brilliant at telling stories as if they were history. Especially in a world full of naive people…
So when people say, “If it wasn’t true, how could an entire people believe it?”, I don’t find that convincing. It’s happened before and after…
And if we’re being rigorous with inductive reasoning, the odds don’t favor Judaism either:
We both agree that dozens of religions were invented by people.
If we use that pattern, it’s more probable that Judaism is also a man-made system, even if it’s the best one.
It’s the same standard we apply to every other religion, so why should Judaism be immune?
Despite all this, I haven’t rejected Judaism.
But here’s my core question, the one I can’t stop asking:
Is Judaism true in the strongest sense?
Not just meaningful.
Not just beautiful.
Not just “ours.”
But actually, metaphysically, true (Probably would be more precise in this context, I think…)
What I’m Asking You
I’m not looking for apologetics. I’m not looking to be convinced emotionally.
I just want to know, from someone I respect intellectually:
What are the strongest rational reasons to believe that God, the real, non-human, first-cause God, actually gave the Torah to the Jewish people?
How do you distinguish true revelation from myth, especially when every myth looks real from the inside?
And how do you, personally, stay committed to Judaism without compromising your rational integrity?
If you’ve written or spoken on this already, I’d be truly grateful for a reference.
Even a short response from management would mean a lot to me.
Thank you for your work, and for showing people like me that thinking deeply and staying honest can still be part of a religious life.
With respect and curiosity,
Ori


Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

0 Answers
מיכי Staff answered 3 months ago
Hello Uri. I write in Hebrew because I assume you understand Hebrew (you said you read and heard my words). First of all, my name is not Levens, but Michael Avraham. I hope you didn’t make a mistake with the address and that you really meant to send these questions to me. To your point, I have dedicated a book to all these questions, the first of which is the one I am presenting, in which I present a complete picture. This is the first book in a trilogy that unfolds my view of faith and Judaism in general. The first book deals with the existence of God, and from there with religious commitment. The second book deals with Jewish thought (in principle, in my opinion, there is no such thing as Jewish thought), and the third with Halacha. Nevertheless, I will briefly address the points you raised here, even though it requires a complete essay. For me, it has no meaning that any system “works.” Pragmatism (as a philosophical approach) is a dirty word. To subordinate the existing to the desired. One must examine whether the system is real, not whether it works. There can be systems that work wonderfully and are nonsense and certainly not real, and there can be real systems that do not work (certainly if they are examined by irrelevant criteria). By the way, the conduct of the religious dimension today in the State of Israel constitutes a great disservice to Judaism according to this criterion. At the very least, the Haredi leadership is the most corrupt, corrupt, and opportunistic establishment that exists in Israel and perhaps in the entire universe. So what use is moral history to me when the present is so shocking?! On a theoretical and conceptual level, I categorically deny any connection between halakha and morality. Halakha is a particular matter that is relevant only to Jews, while morality is universal by definition. In my view, there is no Jewish morality but morality. It is true that the history of the Torah contributed to its formation, but it is found within each of us. I also wrote about this in the columns on the site here, and I can refer you if you wish (you can also search: halakha and morality). You yourself write that tefillin and atzaneh do not promote moral values. I argue further: nothing in halakha is intended to promote morality. Not even honoring parents, the prohibition of murder and theft, and the like. We find morality within ourselves, and therefore every person in the world is required to be moral. The question of who promoted morality and helped to form it (the Torah, Judaism) is a historical question that is not important for our purpose. This is the well-known distinction in the philosophy of science between the context of discovery and the context of justification. After all, Judaism demands morality even from a Gentile, and he is not supposed to know and study the Torah. Furthermore, in my opinion, morality is not the goal, and therefore to measure right and wrong belief by its morality is a mistake. Morality is a means to create a proper society, but society itself has functions for which it exists. These are religious functions, and the law strives for them. However, I really don’t accept your claim of circularity, that is, our inability to measure morality because the standards themselves were created by Judaism. According to this postmodern logic, you can’t measure and evaluate anything. You always do it according to your own standards. I am a moral realist and as such I believe that the morality I have is the right one, and I don’t care if it was created by the Torah or by Buddha. Anyone who doubts this is a skeptic, and skepticism has no way of answering. To what extent can you doubt your own logic, your epistemology, etc. In my opinion, Judaism is definitely unique, and I think that is a significant (even if not conclusive) argument. The examples you gave of different myths are not similar. As far as I know, those myths were not perceived as true by the general public. Nor do they claim to be based on facts passed down from generation to generation on a broad front. There is more to this, and you can search here on the site (there have been discussions about it here). Good luck,

Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Ori replied 3 months ago

definitely meant to send the message to you! it was a confusion i guess…
Also, I do understand Hebrew. I just find it easier to express myself more precisely in English, especially when dealing with deep or philosophical topics. I hope that's okay…

Thank you so much for your thoughtful and respectful response.
There's a lot here for me to think about, and I really appreciate you taking the time to engage with my questions seriously.

מיכי Staff replied 3 months ago

happily

Leave a Reply

Back to top button