Reduction in its simplest form
Greetings to the Honorable Rabbi,
I would like to ask a question, how can one understand that the reduction is as simple as that?
When we observe the world, we encounter that every object is formed through a metamorphic process from a previous object. Oil is formed through a process from fossils, rock from a volcano, a butterfly from a caterpillar, and the world from an explosion.
But nothing is created from nothing. So how can a creation of something be created from nothing?
I see no connection between the question of reductionism as such and creation from nothing. What you see in your experience is nature. The world and its laws were created by God, who is not subject to the laws of nature. Beyond that, the claim that reductionism is not as such is nonsense and therefore it follows that it is as such. You can look for explanations on the website or in the second book of the trilogy.
The previous message was not sent,
If it is not possible to create something from nothing, then a transcendental factor cannot cause an immanent reality external to it. In particular, a physical and material reality, in any case the reduction is not as simple as it seems.
I know the books and therefore I ask, and I also know the cogito.
Is creation not something that comes from nothing? And is something that comes from nothing a logical fallacy?
I don't think a collection of foreign words (used inaccurately) turns something into a question. I answered everything.
Oh, out of nowhere is not a logical fallacy of course.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer