Vision Ish lessons
Hello Rabbi Michael,
I wanted to ask you whether, according to halakha, it is appropriate or correct to be concerned with the lessons of the Chazo'a or is it sufficient to rely on the lessons of the Grach Na'eh, as is the method of most poskim?
Best regards,
It seems to me that the Rabbi Na'ah is usually more right. If someone wants to be strict, that is of course possible, but in my opinion there is no necessity.
Is he also more correct in length measurements or only in volume measurements?
(Irgun said that the olives did not get smaller, and found olives from that period of the same size, but I heard that in terms of length, the Hazo'a is always right.)
I didn't look into it in depth, but they have always practiced the RahN. It is clear that those who practice it have something to rely on.
As far as I know, the custom according to the Rachna was only in terms of volume, in terms of length they practiced according to the Zhva, and the contradiction between length and volume measurements arose already at the time of the B'I and B'I'T, who questioned the contradiction between the customs, which means that this was their custom.
It seems that the T'T himself predicted a letter that was nothing more than a mere
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer