A charge from a tooth or a foot

And also the devices for the two loaves of bread and the shofar and more on Shabbat and devices for the soul of the Jews. If this is not the place for it, unfortunately, is there another place where you wrote about it? It is very interesting to sort and fence off the fences explained in this. But first, wisdom, one must hope that there is some place where Maher Yi Engel collects four or five zillion examples from distant ends of the earth and sea.

All the devices are generally mitzvah devices that I wrote. I addressed this a little in the article on the tenth root. But not to the generalization discussed here.
And so it is in the words of the Maimonides who explains in detail about leaven and matzah that the leaven is forbidden because it ferments the dough. I addressed this in my article on leaven on Passover and the Passover as historical prohibitions.

I read the article to the tenth root, it was very tasty, thank you? [Apologies for the gap in the discussion. The problem is that issues are serious business and it is really burdensome to read without opening and carefully reviewing it, and it also blocks my mind from digesting it. But the capitalization became too demanding for me and it turned out that I was content with reading it in a haphazard manner and if I got it wrong, the ”m].
You said that it is different from the generalization discussed here, and I assume that the intention is the same as the distinction between a basket and a loaf (which is indeed similar to the tenth root in technical random kosher) and a turnip and a barrel. So to expand from the examples of the eye of color and kosher that precede the thing, to the case of a barrel that is an appendix (and not kosher), were there actually no examples given? Something got confusing for me here.
(In another Tikbook I chose the nickname Full Width of Your Country)

The generalization here I mean is the general claim that deals with a device for something that took care of that something, as a generalization to the discussion of devices for a mitzvah (it would be appropriate to say that in mitzvah devices they take care of the mitzvah itself, but not every device is part of the gift). Therefore, it is not certain that this can be simulated in the case of the basket either.

But utensils are not only in the mitzvah but also utensils for eating food, which is not really a mitzvah (or is it? Although one can eat something else) and even though the essential purpose is eating and not preparing food. (And by the way, maybe since utensils are forbidden, there is really support for the claim that utensils are an intermediate state. Aal”t there is something like that on the question of the Rabbinical Rambam and the question of the Sipika).
There is also kosher for impurity and the difference between a shomer (skin = basket) and a hand (a bone with meat at the end, somewhat similar to a barrel) and R’ Yochanan has a hand for kosher like a hand for impurity because kosher for the beginning of impurity. I also saw this once that evidence was brought on the subject and I have now opened it there in the Cholin Kiych, but the memory of the place where they say, "I do not know" as it is written, "He sat down and does not return behind him" is found in the scholars exchanging each other. And from my point of view, I am not familiar with the issue there, and if it is not relevant, I will explain it because I cannot understand it.