A moral value that rejects the Torah’s

In the Shabbat 6th chapter: It is explained in the great law that the honor of human beings that you do not reject is not done in the Torah, as it is said even with regard to the honor of another person, in contrast to the original law, which was said regarding the restoration of loss in an old man and not according to his honor.
In the attached file https://mikyab.net/%D7%A9%D7%95%D7%AA/%d7%a2%d7%a8%d7%9a-%d7%9e%d7%95%d7%a1%d7%a8%d7%99-%d7%94%d7%92%d7%95%d7%91%d7%a8-%d7%a2%d7%9c-%d7%93%d7%99%d7%9f-%d7%aa%d7%95%d7%a8%d7%94
The Rabbi concluded that this law was primarily stated towards the person himself and not towards others. Here it is explained that it was also stated towards others. Moreover, the verse here speaks about the honor of the dead.
The question is, why is it not said so in every conflict between morality and non-deed in the Torah, that the honor of beings is greater, etc., and in particular that here we are talking about a transgression in the act of doing, such as taking the dead from one place to another. Unlike Shabbat Abidah, Datham is in Sho’at.
(This division between Sho’at and Qom Ha’s will also not work here)