Academia and Kant
Hello Rabbi, I would be happy to address two questions on different topics:
1. What is the rabbi’s opinion regarding academic studies such as women and human rights? Is there a particular science or Torah in them that is worth pursuing, or are these areas of interest that arose due to postmodern discourse and do not contain any actual Torah?
2. Regarding the Rabbi’s criticism in the book Two Circles of Kant’s analytical concept, what actually prevents us from accepting that transcendental idealism is the one with which we know the world without belief in any correlative factor between reason and the world itself? And how does the train to Scotland prove belief in the existence of such a correlative factor? Why, if there were no belief in a correlative factor, would we not get off the train, since it is still possible to say that because this is the way in which we know the world, we get off the train every time we see a sign?
Thank you very much.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
2. Kant’s view is not analytic in the full sense. The term analytic-synthetic is derived from our doctrine. It is difficult for me to elaborate here, but I think I explained it there. See also the fourth notebook in the first part, which is entirely devoted to the logic of this argument.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer