New on the site: Michi-bot. An intelligent assistant based on the writings of Rabbi Michael Avraham.

Chapter notes The seller of the ship page 3

שו”תCategory: Talmudic studyChapter notes The seller of the ship page 3
asked 9 years ago

In honor of the Rabbi Rebbe Shlita Ahadsha’t

I have some questions and comments on the chapter that sells the ship and I would appreciate an answer.
I will ask forgiveness for the trouble, but it is Torah and I need to study.

Baba Batra Ag.

A) A miracle of Adra, and so he says, “Six in a basket from Egypt, your interpretation would be for you a miracle.”
And the Rashbam said, “Adra is the curtain that is spread over the mast to guide the ship in the wind.”
And so he says – meaning a robe made of flax and hemp, a type of garment.
And see Rashi Gittin Paz: Makuta – a miracle “spreading over it” is the curtain of a ship and a tsa

b) Rashbam and so he says – “Deigon Dematnitin” is the Akov language as it is written: “You will anchor like you smoke, you will delay from marrying a husband” “Or else, Ogin Dematni’, meaning anchoring”
I didn’t understand what he said and would like to explain.

Agh:
C) And she will take the talisman of the Dahmara in her hands, and the murki from the island of Lahai and from the island of Lahai, and they will not be scattered, nor will they be scattered, and on that day the heavens will rise, and the depths will descend, O God, etc.
And in the Rishbam, the chair of Dahmer is called “both are full of wine” and it was a green wine, mixed together in one another in the heart of the Dakhmashwar, and not even a drop was spilled. And although there was a stormy wind that day, those who sailed the sea in ships were ascending to the heavens and descending to the depths due to the force of the wind, and yet not a drop fell to the ground.
And the Rashsh made this difficult, something that is impossible and of no use to him.
And it seems simple that the Rashbam learned this from the words of the Gemara, “I have placed a chair on the floor of the house” and from the explanation that both are filled with wine. And simple.
However, the Rashbam’s opinion is that even though it was a windy day, not a drop fell.
Apparently this is not a novelty at all, the only novelty is that despite both being full of wine, not a single drop fell.

D) Rashbam Kamiyam Kumkuma Damiya – as a lesson in heating a kettle of “hot” water
Apparently, the Hamin box is incomprehensible, because Hamin water is not heated and heated.

The undersigned respectfully,
that’


Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

0 Answers
מיכי Staff answered 9 years ago
Hello. I understand that the genius in question is me (since it was no coincidence that this email reached me). 🙂 A) Despite my “genius”, I did not understand what the question was. b) Simply put. Anchoring is the language of delay. Just as a woman who is anchored is prevented from getting married. Therefore, an anchor is what prevents the ship from moving. C) The innovation is in the dual situation that they were full and there was also a spirit. And by the way, your comment is incorrect that the cups were necessarily full. Therefore, perhaps Rashbam’s intention is that they were not really full to the brim, but full, meaning that there was a lot of wine in them, and the whole point of the rabuta is that despite the storm, the wine did not spill. And your questions are one after another. Such are the words of Hadar the Genius. But there is no need to say that all of this is of course just a bunch of nonsense and I do not see what difficulty there is here. And by the way, even with two completely full cups, this is indeed possible in principle (and certainly the lulliness here did not detract from Shmuel, who is versed in the art of tilting and divination). d) Heat a kettle of hot water (which is intended for heating water), that is, heat until the water becomes hot. After the introduction, I was afraid and worried that Mr. Pah Kekush might have a secret for me, and his questions would not be appropriate for an ignorant person like me. But in conclusion, I wonder if Mr. Maltz is in me, and that he will exchange Passover for Purim, and Tzelek.

Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

ש' replied 9 years ago

Yesh”ek Gadol

Why didn't Rashba”m write Ugin, we were Akov and nothing else

Why did Da'igon write Akov, we were Akov and Ugin, we were Akov

מיכי Staff replied 9 years ago

Because he wanted to prove his point.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button