Cosmological view
In the SD
Good night,
Peace and blessings,
In the cosmological view in the notebooks, so that the problem of infinity does not arise, I reformulated the view approximately as follows: Everything that we have familiarity with and experience about has a reason for its creation, and what we have no knowledge about does not necessarily have a reason. And in fact, the first reality that has no reason – which we can define as God. (I hope I was precise in my words).
The question that perhaps needs to be further clarified is why the world itself, with all its components, is considered something about which we have experience. After all, we have never seen that dirt or water were created. In my understanding, this is at most our intuitive hypothesis. Therefore, perhaps it is possible to argue, as the Rabbinic
I would be happy to explain the matter.
Thank you very much,
Maybe it’s possible, but it’s unlikely. I explained in my notebook that the universe is nothing more than a collection of its components. And if you’re talking about the dirt itself, we know that it’s a crumbling rock and the like, and that too was created. And in general, if anything, then your claim is not about the entire universe, but about every elementary component in it (such as dirt).
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer