Did Hitler study and walk in the name of God?
In the SRD.
peace.
A. Hitler was schizophrenic and acted in the name of that almighty God. “I am carrying out the orders that Providence has given me,” Hitler told journalist Karl von Weigand. “There is no power in the world now that can undermine the German Reich,” Hitler said in an interview with American journalist Pierre Huss, which was later published in his book The Foe We Face. “It is the will of Providence that I carry out Germany’s mission,” he told him. The American psychoanalyst Walter Langer submitted a report to the OSS in 1943 that was classified for a long time and was only released in 1968. “Hitler almost certainly believes that he has been sent by Providence and that he has a specific mission to carry out,” Langer wrote. “How exactly his mission will be carried out is unclear to him, but it does not bother him because there is an ‘inner voice’ that guides him in the steps he must take.” “But if the voice speaks to me, I know it is time to act,” Hitler told Hermann Rauschening.
1. Where was God in Hitler’s schizophrenia, which resulted in the slaughter of tens of millions, even with unspeakable cruelty?
2. Did he walk in his own name like all the prophets?
on. Granot: If you examine Hitler’s behavior closely, like Stalin’s, you can easily see that they completely imitated religion: they crowned themselves as gods whose all commandments are sacred and unquestionable, they created a cult of their personality – just like the cult of God, they established teachings that cannot be changed, only interpreted – just like the teachings of religions, and they demanded blind obedience to their most horrific orders – just like religion demands obedience – “we will do and we will listen.”
Hitler was an anti-humanist, an extreme and uncompromising averse to morality, and these distorted tendencies stem from religion, which seeks a supreme value beyond the human sphere. What distinguishes Hitler from religion is that he merely founded a new religion, at the center of which he placed himself as a kind of god. In the eyes of the German people, Hitler had the aura of a god. Hitler actually founded a state with religious characteristics, with the supreme value revealing itself in it. The religious command recognizes the existence of peoples who were destined in advance for destruction (Genesis 15; Deuteronomy 20); it recognizes the sorting and selection of people before killing them (Numbers 33; 2 Chronicles 8); the religious command requires the slaughter of people as a solution to heresy and idolatry. So did Moses (Exodus 33), so did Elijah (Exodus 41:18), so did Jehu (Exodus 42:10). Although Jehu did not turn away from the sins of Jeroboam son of Nebat, he was praised for his mass murder of the infidels. And so did the righteous King Josiah (42:23). The religious command requires separation from other peoples to the point of expelling women and children (8:9-10). Etc.
1. What does the religion that claims to quote God and in his name commit all atrocities have to do with Hitler and Stalin, who acted from semi-religious motives?
A. This is not a place for statements, but for questions. If you have a question, post it. If not, please choose a more appropriate site to post your thoughts.
You too were sent by God to ask this question.
All from God.
As you can see, the things are reasoned and the questions are in their place with a question mark at the end. You have nothing to answer because the questions are too difficult.
For the benefit of all, you should emphasize that the questions are not only difficult but also original and new.
I formulated the questions from my mind and they stand in their place.
The question is wrong. Hitler brought the madness upon himself. Hitler was a compulsive drug addict and lived day and night on hard drugs. Haven't you read the new investigation? See a report in Haaretz about the book that turns brains. Nazi Germany was an assembly line for hallucinogens and stimulants on an insane scale. What does this have to do with a prophet who hears the word of God without stimulants and without wine. And sits down to write noble poetry like Isaiah, the prophet Amos or Hosea. What's the connection?! Read Heschel on the gap between the prophet and the mystic and your questions will rot back into your dogmatic shell
I read, I read. The drugs were in between and after. His schizophrenia was before, with and without drugs. If you look closely at the scriptures, you will see that the prophecy is closely related to madness. In their time they did not know how to give a definite diagnosis of schizophrenia, but the symptoms are similar. I did not come to diminish deviant experiences, but every coin has a side. You are welcome to get confused again.
On September 11, 1981, Hitler may have had some kind of mental illness, but he acted out of a deeply rooted ideology that saw Jewish morality as a factor that castrated the "blonde wild beast" and prevented it from acting according to its animalistic instincts. The extermination of the Jews was an ideological necessity to also eliminate "Jewish morality" and the remorse it arouses in the human savage.
Best regards, Sh.
There is no peace for the wicked. Therefore, there is no peace for you, A. It has been quiet from you for a week and a half. And now you have returned to bother with your klutz Ksheiyas. As you wrote in response to one of the articles of the Ramada (which I do not have the strength to look up now) that you will be with us until
Even though I sent you to study. You claimed that you are already sufficiently learned and you are revealed time and again in your ignorance and shallowness.
Your questions are not difficult. What is more, you owe me an answer from your previous question about something regarding the inconsistency from which it developed into the work of sacrifices. Look at the thread there and do not evade!!!
Anyway, to your questions this time.
A. You must have studied the scriptures, whether it is the Bible, Mishnah and Gemara. That once upon a time we had a magnificent and sacred Temple. But the Almighty destroyed it. Look at the Gemara Yoma Teshuvah Why was the First Temple destroyed? And why was the Second Temple destroyed? (And also in Tractate Shabbat and Tractate Bava Metzia and in the Tosafot excuse in place.)
Why don't you ask: Where was the Holy One during the destruction of the Temple?
And the answer is simple: He was there!! He gave the power to the Babylonians and the Romans to destroy the Temple. He gives the power to our enemies to overcome us. For “when the voice is the voice of Jacob” then there are no “hands the hands of Esau” but “and it was when you lifted up and took off his yoke from off your necks”.
Are you looking for a spiritual reason why the Holocaust happened? Do you want to understand why evil came upon us? Do you want to know the accounts of heaven?
Many want to. But the answer is above and those who seek can go up there with only a one-way ticket. And there you will receive answers to all your questions!
Or choose the sentence I already wrote for you in your previous question “Faith begins where reason ends”!!
B. You are asking about Hitler's schizophrenia. Whatever the reason for the Holocaust. Whether it is the spiritual reason or the physical reason. God turned things around in such a way that there was a Holocaust and the whole world stood by.
In the Holocaust, the peak of the glory of the Jews in the grammar of Halacha or in the laws between man and his fellow man was revealed. And so were Gentiles who are called in the law “Righteous Among the Nations” who saved Jews.
From the side of divine reality – Everything that happened in the Holocaust was under the personal care of God, the Creator of the world.
C. Even though your questions are formulated and you often comment to others on matters of grammar. In general, the Rabbi is right that these are statements. Because you did not come to receive answers but to declare that because of these questions you have lifted the burden of religion from yourself!
D. Also in the last part of your questions regarding the killing of 7 peoples who lived in the land of Canaan. And so on with the rest of the quotations you mentioned from your Bible.
First, regarding 7 peoples – as you know, the Girgash people made way and went to Africa and were not killed. The other peoples could have done the same, but they chose to fight for the land of Canaan.
Second, regarding Jews who worship idols. The religious commandment does not require slaughter. Because you could equally ask about desecrating the Sabbath, which requires stoning, or you shall not murder, which requires death by sword. In short, could you ask about all court deaths?
As you know from your studies, these deaths constitute atonement for the sinner. And also so that they may hear and fear. There is no massacre here.
The stupid idea that you compare this to Stalin or Hitler who killed out of madness and mental illness, egoism and sadism. It does not even begin to resemble Judaism.
You will agree (hahaha you have no choice) that it is impossible that to the same extent that the Torah commands mercy and compassion, it should command a massacre of a people – because that is how I feel like it?
Third and last – I already wrote to you – “ If you did not read it twice and if you did not read it twice and if you read it three times and they did not interpret it for you” – Go study the Torah and the history of the Jewish people and stop confusing your mind!!
Hopefully I did not talk to the wall. And I do not need you to answer me back.
He operated from an anti-Semitic street ideology. He worked as a painter's assistant and he listened to his anti-Semitic speeches and sucked them in. From that uneducated German painter's assistant and the rejected and untalented artist that he was, tens of millions were slaughtered. The very hand of fate.
A. I didn't notice that you were the one asking the main question here. Hello, hello! Of course I don't agree with the comparison between the prophet and the schizophrenic, I was personally convinced by Eliezer Berkowitz's well-reasoned arguments on the issue in his book “God, Man and History”. As stated, in my understanding, a schizophrenic does not write Isaiah and does not influence history like the prophets of Israel. In contrast, neither did the Buddha nor Jesus. If there was a crazy maniac, it might be Muhammad, whose teachings led to bloodshed. The teachings of Israel did not lead to bloodshed. If I believe that Moses wrote the Torah and the Book of Deuteronomy from the mouth of God – I have no doubt about him because God knows what he is doing and everything is for the best. This is not the God of the false prophet Hitler, from whose heart he speaks. And if I accept the research opinion that the Book of Deuteronomy was written by the sages of Israel at the end of the First Temple (by virtue of the tradition of the Oral Torah and the like from the mouth of Moses, whether it was or not – see Tigai's comprehensive introduction to the Book of Israel on the Book of Deuteronomy) then I have no problem at all. The killing of the nations did not actually take place and is entirely a myth designed to convey a message. Either way, the Torah of Israel did not lead to increased destruction in the world, but rather the opposite. This is a huge difference from those who actually slaughtered and killed in the name of their religion or their atheism. And Akmel - I do not have the leisure to respond here anymore
P.S. Regarding your questions about drugs, Miche Melitz: A. Yahweska – real and without reading. Drink! B. Reading Michael Pollan “How to Change Your Mind” fascinating and mind-altering.
https://www.bhol.co.il/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=2890972
Gil, I don't expect preferential treatment, brother. The comparison between prophecy and schizophrenia does not depend on your opinion, but on research. Those who wrote the books of the Bible are not those prophets, but scribes in the Second Temple. On the one hand, you write that ’Israel's Torah did not lead to bloodshed’ and on the other hand, ‘If I believe that Moses wrote the Torah from the mouth of God’. If you accept the things in the Torah as they are, then there was bloodshed. Even if you don't, it doesn't depend on you but on whether it is truly historically correct.
They did not kill in the name of atheism. It is true that there were atheists among them in the overall relationship, but the spearhead there was their belief in their ancient idols and Hitler acted in the name of God, even though, absurdly, he turned himself into a kind of god. Don't deny the comparisons made here between religion and their new religion. Put that in your question mark and investigate.
Regarding the PS, I know about ayahuasca and its effects and I read the book The Truth by Michael Pollan, which is highly recommended.
A.
God forbid, not a preferential treatment, but after I apologized for my unjustified arrival, it is not appropriate for me to write to you to wallow in your shell (even if it is very poetic). Of course, I will continue to disagree and I will stand my ground. It is over and we will not be finished.
The shadow of the blow never came. And simply
The shell has the Fibonacci golden ratio, so I took that as a compliment (;
Tzachi, you have no idea how much I enjoy being called evil. It just shows me how much I'm on the right track in terms of morality. As for the rest of what you wrote, I skimmed through it once and gave up. Because once you read a line, you're too lazy to read the next line, because of the echo of stupidity. My suggestion to you is, first of all, free yourself from religion, it will open up some horizons in your narrow mind, and second, go study.
Good morning. It is interesting to note that one of Hitler's arguments was that the Jews introduced 2 defects into man. (First in his body, and second in his soul)
In his body it is ‘circumcision’ of course..
In his soul it is *morality*.. (an indefatigable part of their religion), and morality is for the weak.. and these things are widely publicized.. (Which religion exactly did he suck from?)
Also according to the site owner, that morality and commandments are legal orders.. It is interesting to see how they overlap in a surprising way in some of the commandments.. (I think they are legal orders, but in my opinion some of the commandments were dressed up in moral ideas and not without reason.. to carry out the law in practice ‘and do what is right and good’, and that the nation of God will rub shoulders with morality along the way..).
Regarding the analogy of killing Nazis to feeding Amalek.. I don't know where to start to refute this joke..
Instead of refuting.. I'll say that I heard that Aristotle didn't tend to discuss deep issues with every person.. (Unlike Socrates, who was the ‘Rabbi Michai’ of Athens], Aristotle's spiritual grandfather) He would argue:
a) That a person is not old.
b) That he is not virtuous.
c) That he is not of sound mind.
There is nothing to start discussing with him at all. Because he won't be able to go deeper with you.. (And maybe he doesn't even have the possibility to understand. According to Aristotle, young age prevents the perception of deep concepts).
I don't know who the young men of Athens were at that time, and why Aristotle claimed that one can only discuss with the elderly (I understand that old age is a sufficient condition for a good discussion, but I don't understand why it is a necessary condition.. and this is not the place to investigate).
But regarding the soul of Bar Helugata, I agree 100%. Not everyone can have deep conversations.
There is a person who is shallow on subject A and deep on other subjects, with that person I would not recommend philosophers to delve into A..
To answer your question, you are currently in a psychological position where it is inappropriate to attack any religious scent whatsoever.. Therefore, of course, it is ridiculous to write you complex responses that require joint thought and enlightenment..
If you notice, just like you, I did not write any real Shekel and Terya argument.. But I managed to twist it as a response to you somehow.. Just when you did with Rabbi Michai Bahai.. {And proof of that, Rabbi Michai's method of divine intervention is famous, widely published.. Therefore, it is quite amusing to read to whom you directed your question 🙂 }
So apparently either 1) that analogy is not your strong point. Or 2) You came to try to get your bearings by being a writer.. (and not asking. Like all your ‘questions’.. no wonder that in almost every ‘question’ there are plenty of logical fallacies, and the reason is – it's simply not a question (!) It's a rustic quip disguised as a question). [And quip is not so much a logical fallacy, because there is no expectation of consistency in feelings]
And since I don't hold a grudge against you, I'll take the Halacha as a test. (Writer and that..) Good morning
Quote from A’'s response – “I know about Ayahuasca and its effects and I read the book The Truth by Michael Pollan, which is highly recommended”
A’, you are simply a clown with a red nose! You are trying to play it scholarly. You read books and recommend them.
You can equally read the books of Agatha Christie, Arthur Conan Doyle or Carl May (I just got stuck..)
Because in all the books you invest in reading and researching there is no progress on the subject you are stuck on.
Are you sure that you are right to renew doubts and questions based on what you read?
After all, your questions boil down to the general question “Where was God in the Holocaust”? Which is a question I have heard so many times in my life. (And as far as I know, I'm almost twice your age) Almost every secular 90-year-old Holocaust survivor asks this question. (And honestly, who are we to stand up to him? It's really not easy to stand up to such an ordeal.)
In the previous question you started with the ”inconsistency” etc’ – the questions were in the style of the wicked Turnus Rufus.
And if we summarize all your questions from the past, present and future, they amount to the question of the wicked son in the Passover Haggadah:
“What is this work for you”?
Funny, there is nothing new under the sun. You don't invent questions. Read books of debates by Jews and Christians from previous generations. Study the Book of the Khozari or other books written for the confused in our generation and you will see that some of the questions have clear answers and some of the questions depend on faith!!
If I were to truly recommend a book to you (even though I'm aware that I'll raise a crowd of haters) then you would read “Bagan Ha'Amunah” by Rabbi Shalom Arush.
Good luck!!
I also went through your stupid response. And apart from evasion I didn't see any response.
And as the Ram”d wrote to you, you will find another site to spread your nonsense.
It is worth noting another aspect of Hitler, which is: obsessive reading. He read books endlessly and collected from them everything that strengthened his burning hatred. He also gave his ideas an intellectual touch. The combination of obsessive reading and pathological hatred – is a dangerous combination…
Best regards,, Anonymous
In line 3
… Intellectual image…
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
