Does the rabbi have any idea why?
I thought there was something about the right and rabbis that was fundamentally corrupt.
Because Olmert was prime minister and the left was satisfied.
But he was immediately dismissed when there were investigations against him.
They didn’t even wait for the conclusions and certainly not for the hearing.
KV not to actually indict
K.W. Ben, son of K.W.
Not for trial
For more than that, it never occurred to me that you should continue at the head of the people.
But Bibi, despite all of the above, the right wing and rabbis do let him rule.
Does that mean that rabbis and the right are corruption?
Is there a better explanation?
The comparison is a bit rash, but there’s something to it. But it’s more complex.
The rabbis and the religious need Bibi and the Likud because without him they have no power and influence. They cannot be in power themselves. Beyond that, there is a feeling of one-sidedness from the media and the legal system, which also has something in it, and therefore they do not trust them and defend themselves against them. And finally, indeed, the religious are less sensitive to moral and democratic values, because they feel that they are entrusted with religious values. Therefore, they reject the latter over the former. And the same goes for the right regarding the values of tradition and nation. The left has nothing in its world but moral and democratic values, and naturally it is focused on them.
And yet, even with regard to the left, one should not exaggerate in their assessment of its morality. See how it behaves when its own values are violated (including LGBTQ people). See the progressive world’s support for Palestinian terrorism simply because it suits the agenda. See their support for a nepotistic justice system that operates in a detached and scandalous manner and is unwilling to accept criticism, simply because it is opposed to the government.
Thanks
In principle, there were supposed to be rabbis against corruption
Religion is full of it
In the end, it somehow turns out the other way around
I remember that the rabbi once wrote about this in response to Rabbi Dr. Ratzon Arusi
that it is not enough to examine the principles but also the actual implementation
and in actual implementation the face of the rabbis (not all of them) is the face of corruption
In such matters, consistency should be examined. The legal right in general attributes less importance to indictments, also because of a lack of trust in the system, but mainly on an ideological level (public officials are not allowed to dismiss their elected officials). This is a consistent opinion of right-wing jurists. When Bibi said at the time that Olmert should resign, he was talking nonsense, and I said so in real time as well. He did not represent the ideological legal right in doing so.
You are making life too easy for yourself. The discussion is not about whether it is legally appropriate to impeach a corrupt prime minister or whether there is an indictment against him. The question is whether it is appropriate to support him and join him in a coalition. That is a completely different question.
The question is a moral one,
in which the left and the center receive an excellent score
and the right and the rabbis a low score
Apparently
If you want a son who is upright in his ways, who finds favor and who has good intelligence in the eyes of God and man
Be careful that he does not study rabbinate
If he becomes a rabbi
They will say of you, "Oh, his father, who learned Torah, oh, his master, who learned Torah, see his ways and deeds, how corrupt and ugly they are
(There are also upright rabbis)
Natan Eshel said at the time that the hive that wasn't Bibi thought that following Bibi's cases, the right would abandon him. It turned out to them that it works the other way around, that if Bibi has cases and is corrupt, it means that he is a man and not a pervert, and therefore, on the contrary, it has been proven that he is more suitable for the prime ministership. I don't know if this is true, but these are roughly Natan Eshel's words in support of the right and the BIBSTs.
He added that hatred is what unites their camp. Hatred for the left, the media, the court, etc. I think the rabbis support him also because of hatred for the left, etc., and mainly because they need him.
This is nonsense. It's not because of the criminality but because the feeling is that he is being persecuted (and there is justice in it).
We frown, I suggest that you start focusing on the arguments and try to innovate a little. Your words are demagogic propaganda and I will soon start deleting.
I also feel that he is being persecuted, but he intensifies it so much and creates deliberate tension to create an image of a poor man.
Imagine that you are a journalist (may God have mercy on him) and you see with your own eyes how Bibi behaves. Corrupt, a liar, an instigator, a hedonist, giving Sarah a free hand, and more. In general, it was clear to you that this was a harmful and dangerous person for the country. Wouldn't you have him for every little mistake?!
(And I'm not saying that this is the case.)
I completely agree, but the fact is that right-wing journalists are less involved (if at all), and the mainstream media is dominated by center-left people. This is exactly the basis for the feeling I described.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
