evolution

The rabbi’s opinion that evolution is actually a reinforcement of belief in God is well-known (since the improbable actually happened).
I wanted to ask one earlier question – after everything you’ve read about evolution and what you know about it, do you have any professional-logical-analytical misconceptions about the scientific theory of evolution itself, about its various details and rules (at least from what you know)? Perhaps about the way scientists draw conclusions in the field or work with observations or fossils?
Or does everything seem to you to be kosher from this perspective and does it seem that there is no reason to accept its central themes (at least those that are not in dispute among researchers) as a sufficiently strong and well-founded scientific theory?