fairness
You attribute many positions in the field of religion, observance of commandments, beliefs, etc., held by individuals and the public, to psychological factors, and you even allow yourself to mock some of these factors. Regardless of my opinion on the merits, would you agree that your positions on the above-mentioned issues would also be analyzed using such tools, and would you be open-minded if this were to be reflected in responses to you?
Instead of making general and false statements, it’s better to give examples. And finally, try me.
Lies???? Are you sometimes here on the forum?
Give examples instead of gossip.
Take this as a small sample, from the article before last, and again, regardless of my opinion on the matter:
“This is actually an accurate description of the personality disorder known as ‘sociopathy’, which is now commonly called ‘antisocial personality disorder”.
An example of what this is? I think we need a reading comprehension lesson.
I need a reading comprehension lesson?????….. What's not clear? You attribute the positions of those you criticize and oppose to their views – among other things – with antisocial personality disorder!! And I repeat my original question: Would you agree that criticism of your positions on various issues, just for example, your view on “thin Judaism”, be explained against the background of a personality disorder, arrogance, a compulsive need to enter the gallery of reformers, and more.
I completely agree that the mental diagnosis should be accompanied by additional reasons, but the question still exists.
I will emphasize once again, nothing I wrote teaches about my positions, and it cannot be concluded from this that I oppose your positions. My question exists for itself.
I'm glad my lesson was successful. You added an important addition here. The reasoning. I didn't hang anything on the diagnosis. I hung on the reasoning. The diagnosis is the result of the reasoning and not an assumption on which I base myself. That's not called "hanging". Long live the small difference.
After the reading comprehension lesson, I can reply:
If you hang arguments on my diagnosis, I have nothing to talk to you about. But if you conclude by reason something about a disorder I have, I have no problem with you at all. And did you imagine that I would have a problem with that?
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
