New on the site: Michi-bot. An intelligent assistant based on the writings of Rabbi Michael Avraham.

First and last

שו”תCategory: Meta HalachaFirst and last
asked 5 years ago

To the Rabbi, peace be upon you.
In the scholastic-analytical columns, after the analytical presentation, the Rabbi turned to various methods of the Rishonim and Acharonim and discussed them in light of the analytical analysis. Ostensibly, in light of the Rabbi’s method, this discussion is unnecessary. Contrary to the traditional approach, the Rishonim and Acharonim have no authority in the eyes of the Rabbi – only the Talmud – and the student’s own understanding. So why discuss all these methods? We will be content with studying the Gemara and analyzing the issue analytically.
A related question is found in a halakhic responsa in which the rabbi sometimes refers to the Shulchan Aruch and its subjects or to various first and last methods. Even there, it is not necessary for the rabbi to give his opinion without considering those methods. So why mention them?


Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

0 Answers
מיכי Staff answered 5 years ago
They do not have mandatory authority, but their position certainly carries weight. When I do not have a good reason, I am certainly willing to adopt the ruling of one or another rabbi. Beyond that, the questioner usually wants to rely on sources. Regarding scholarly inquiry, even in philosophy, when there is no authority for certain thinkers or others, one clarifies the different positions. This is the way to clarify a scholarly or philosophical issue.

Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

מיכי Staff replied 5 years ago

And after the clarification, if desired, they also decide what the conclusion is. For example, in the last few columns I explain why I support globalism.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button