Free choice?
Free choice
In the SD
peace,
I wanted to ask how free choice is compatible with our thoughts being deterministic?
For example, when I think about something, the brain associatively links it to a new topic, after which I think about something else, and so on and so forth.
So it can be described as a kind of long wheel of thought, related to the power of imagination.
But the thing is, all of these thoughts are actually deterministic.
Likewise, when we think about something, we can always think of a reason that preceded it. For example, an association or something, not something without a reason at all…
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
But according to Leibowitz, a person also determines the values themselves, so how is this possible if there is free choice? It is at most random.
Are you saying that in fact we can decide which topic we will think about, but in many parts of it there is no choice - purely logical associations or calculations?
(As if many of the things we do in our daily lives are done automatically while we largely determine what to do)?
A person does not determine the values, but only whether he responds to them. See column 456-7.
This is a snail that does not change anything. Choice does not mean the complete absence of constraints. The question is whether the constraints dictate the outcome or only influence it. In my opinion, they only influence.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer