Freedom and liberty

Sorry to ask anyway, but if the Rabbi could explain briefly it would be very helpful to me.
Why does only limitation allow freedom? And why is it that the more limited I am, the more freedom I have?

I explained there. I don't understand what I should do. If there is an unclear point, say what it is. But here you are asking me to subtract from what I wrote there.
Freedom is a factual state, and therefore conceptually it cannot be a value.

Why is our ability to choose not freedom unless it is a value dilemma? Why, for example, is it not freedom if I decide to eat vanilla ice cream instead of strawberry ice cream but only freedom, while if I help an old woman on the street and because of that I miss my bus, it is freedom?

Because a dilemma that is not a value is the result of a deterministic calculation and not a choice. Everything is in the hands of God except for the fear of God. See my article on choice: https://mikyab.net/%d7%9e%d7%90%d7%9e%d7%a8%d7%99%d7%9d/%d7%9e%d7%91%d7%98-%d7%a9%d7%99%d7%98%d7%aa%d7%99-%d7%a2%d7%9c-%d7%97%d7%95%d7%a4%d7%a9-%d7%94%d7%a8%d7%a6%d7%95%d7%9f/

Thanks, and another question:
You claim that freedom is not a value because it is a fact, but a person's wisdom is also a fact and we still tend to see it as a value in itself.
The attainment of enlightenment and the like.
What is the difference?

It's strange to me that you ask, when you yourself write the answer in the body of the question. Intelligence is not a value. It is a fact. Improving abilities and acquiring education (achieving enlightenment, in your language) is a value, and this is of course a choice and not a fact.

Don't we see value in wisdom for its own sake? Isn't the rank of a wise person greater than that of a fool (as Maimonides writes in The Guide to the Perplexed)?
My intuition says that there is value in this, and not that it is just a neutral fact.

I don't know who "we" is. I wrote my own opinion.