Hello Rabbi Mikhi, a few days ago I asked you about the possibility of basing conservatism on the principle of the decree that something that is accepted by the public must be accepted (which is why it is strictly forbidden to disagree about the Gemara of the Day of Judgment) and you wrote that you had not heard of such a decree. I found Rambam in his introduction to the books of the strong hand, who writes that the reason the Amoraim did not disagree about the Tannaim is because “the majority of the sages of Israel agreed to it.” The Rivash explains the matter in the name of the Ramban (6:39) “that the acceptance of the rabbis to make a reservation and a boundary for the Torah is like accepting the Torah and applies to them and their descendants after them, even though they did not accept it by consent, only that they acted in such a way as a reservation for the Torah.” And some of the first ones touch on this matter. If so, I am trying to propose this principle as a binding foundation for conservatism, that something that is accepted by the public must be acted in this way, and this is also true in matters of current opinion, such as if the majority of the public accepts a certain custom, it must be observed.