His disciples, so to speak. But they seem to belong more to his opponents?

The rabbi can probably answer this question/conundrum.
You used to be a ‘good slob’.
(I ask many of those who are like that today, but their answers belong more to the realm of lies, gibberish, and conspiracies and less to truth, wisdom, and common sense)
Rabbi Kook wrote about 3 forces in the leadership of the people: universal religious (the best and most beautiful of the world’s values ​​and morals) and national.
It is common to see this as the religious left and right.
And he writes that this without this and this without this will not succeed.
But everyone complements the ‘people’.
How is it that those who consider themselves his disciples, who yearn for a government that consists only of nationalism and religion, now give up on the universal in advance?
After all, according to many, this is a flawed, inappropriate situation that will not succeed?
Maybe they are just not his students?