In honor of Rabbi/Dr. Michael Avraham

My name is Guy and I have been interested in scientific-philosophical questions for quite some time. I thought about your case with the following interesting argument: Suppose that scientists develop a humanoid robot in the future. And the robot will be so similar to a human that we will not be able to distinguish it from a real person (let’s say it will even be made of organic material and contain a replication mechanism, like a living creature). Without a doubt, such a robot would be proof of great planning. So why not the much more complex human himself?

Additionally, I wrote a post about the problems with the theory of evolution and I thought it might interest you:

https://www.inn.co.il/Forum/Forum.aspx/t1215923