Is the Zionist movement against morality?

Hello Rabbi, I saw that you defined yourself as a “religious Zionist,” without a hyphen, to emphasize that your Zionism stems (only, or mainly) from universal moral values. Therefore, I wanted to ask you what you think about the following text:
“What is racism?”

Racism is discrimination or hostility based on
ethnic.

What is Zionism?

Zionism is a movement to establish a Jewish state on the southeastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea, a region of land that at the time of Zionism’s emergence was inhabited mostly by non-Jews – Palestinian Christians and Muslims.

Okay, but how does that make Zionism racist?

Very simple. Remember the definition of racism? Let’s use it:

Discrimination on the basis of ethnicity – Zionism never asked the opinion of the indigenous Palestinians about the establishment of a Jewish state in their own homeland. This is a serious violation of the principles of democracy: even though they constituted close to 100% of the population, no one bothered to ask what the indigenous Palestinians thought. why? Because they are simply not Jews. The more prominent democratic principle – the will of the majority – was denied to the indigenous population of the country, because they came from the wrong ethnic background. The indigenous Palestinians of course supported Arab independence, but their opinion was not interesting. This is why, incidentally, the Zionists strongly opposed the establishment of a legislative council throughout the Mandate years – because the will of the majority would have nullified the Zionist enterprise.

Ethnic-based hostility – Since the emergence of Zionism, the indigenous Palestinians, who lived in their homeland, have been seen and perceived as an “obstacle.” why? Because Zionism – the establishment of a “Jewish” state – requires a Jewish majority in the land. And since there was a clear majority for non-Jewish Palestinians at the time, the very presence of this indigenous population became undesirable. Zionism caused an unbelievable phenomenon: people were perceived as undesirable – just because they lived in their own house. And when an Israeli politician today calls Palestinians “a thorn in the ass” (the author of the text was probably referring here to the current Prime Minister of Israel, Naftali Bennett, who said this perhaps against the background of frustration that the presence of Palestinians in the territories “prevents” Israel from annexing them) – you will understand how much damage this perception caused, the effects of which remain with us to this day.”
Does the rabbi have a response to these claims? These sound like very serious claims. Since you said you are a Zionist like David Ben-Gurion was a Zionist, you would not answer them with the answer “This is what the Torah commanded us.” The question is, then, what is your response to them, as a “secular Zionist.”