Is this the least threatening war?
Hello Rabbi Michael,
In the last column about the recruitment of yeshiva students, you wrote, “[The] least threatening and dangerous war we have ever waged.”
In the broad view that sees the campaign here against Iran and its proxies, against jihadist Arab Islam in Gaza, Lebanon, Judea and Samaria, among Arab citizens of Israel – do you still see things that way?!
Good news 🇮🇱
definitely.
Do you bring into the picture the spirits in the US? And of course the political, diplomatic, security and military leadership, academic, legal, media and more? The Arab-Muslim jihadist spirit? Egypt and Jordan in the short-medium-long term? And again, Iran and its proxies?
If so, I am really interested in understanding how you see the overall campaign because it is of course significant for the priorities in managing our lives here.
*The Iranian plan to strengthen its branches?
You also forgot the alien attacks on Mars, the demonic elders' plans and the European Union, and Samael. Oh, and the social divide, the economic problems, the traffic accidents and infectious diseases.
And I haven't even mentioned that conscripting yeshiva students won't solve any of the problems you raised. Most of the things have nothing to do with the number of soldiers that was discussed. That's it. I've exhausted them.
A. I was referring to this sentence itself without the context of the column.
B. What is considered a fictional script? It is an invitation to get to know the enemy, where we are - and at least leave questions open.
The Simchat Torah script would also have seemed fictional to the entire security establishment (including the Prime Minister) - despite the warnings. The warnings of Brick and Mordechai Kedar about a regional war also sounded fictional and now less so.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
