Liberalism in the face of discrimination
You claim that you are in favor of adopting liberal values and modernity.
On the other hand, I’m going over what’s written here, and I didn’t find a single tweet against the policy of occupation and separation that the State of Israel is carrying out in the territories it occupied in 1967.
I have no objections to the Haredim and the disciples of Rav Kook – they believe in the “beginning of redemption”, the commandment to inherit the land, and the sanctity of the state, etc.
But you, who don’t really recognize these concepts, and even claim that liberal values should be adopted, should be the first to come out against the occupation and separation in the Judea and Samaria territories.
By the way, segregation and discrimination on national grounds have nothing to do with whether or not there is terrorism; they have always existed. And even if there isn’t even a small speck of terrorism, no one is deluding themselves that tomorrow morning residents of Eastern Jerusalem will receive a blue ID card and go vote in the elections.
So what’s up with your liberalism – is it just lip service?
It is true that there are many stupid liberals, but not all of them are like that. There is no liberal obligation to treat in a forgiving and inclusive manner an enemy who wants to destroy us and whose main identity is that he wants to inherit us. Unfortunately, the left perceives the term liberalism as synonymous with stupid, and it is not.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer