New on the site: Michi-bot. An intelligent assistant based on the writings of Rabbi Michael Avraham.

Living according to reason?

שו”תCategory: philosophyLiving according to reason?
asked 10 months ago

In many situations I find myself endlessly debating between options on important and critical issues in life and also in simple everyday situations. Without being able to decide what is right until “something happens by itself”. It is impossible to distinguish what is intellectually correct, what makes sense, what comes from emotions, imaginations, and so on. I don’t think this is a personal problem of mine, but it happens to every person, but the intensity of the confusion depends on his ability to think and imagine (if they are strong, it will be more difficult for him). I ask 1. Is it possible, at all, to direct life according to reason and logic. Is it possible to trust our judgment and thinking skills? 2. How do I know if I made an informed decision or an impulsive one stemming from emotions? After all, my intuition that I made an informed decision is no different from a “feeling”, as certain as you might imagine. If there is no way to know, isn’t the statement that ‘you need to make informed decisions’ a bit empty of content? 3. We can say that we should go with what is reasonable, even if there is no certainty. But what if the options are really equal? ​​4. If it is clear to me that emotions and imagination play tricks on our minds, how can we still trust this loose “reasonable”? Why should we believe it? 5. Perhaps the obvious thing is that we have no way of knowing anything, except for our instincts

Leave a Reply

0 Answers
מיכי Staff answered 10 months ago

Too general a question. As a rule, if you are a skeptic you will not find an answer to your questions. If you are not a skeptic you believe what seems reasonable to you. If the doubt is reasonable, then yes, according to the laws of sufficient evidence. And if it does not seem reasonable to you, then it is probably not reasonable (otherwise you are a skeptic, and we are back to the question).

אליהו פיטוסי replied 10 months ago

The question is, what do you define as a skeptic? Someone who doesn't believe what their eyes see? Or someone who just doesn't have absolute certainty about things? Depends on the definition. A normal person will believe in a few basic facts about the world and themselves. What about almost everything? If it's 'reasonable', is that enough to be considered rational? Why even?

מיכי Staff replied 10 months ago

A person who does not have absolute certainty is a rational person and not a skeptic. Those who have absolute certainty are either prophets or fools. A skeptic is someone who does not embrace intuitions that he has, even when there is no reason to doubt them.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button