New on the site: Michi-bot. An intelligent assistant based on the writings of Rabbi Michael Avraham.

Living with a mistress as a default solution to a late single life

שו”תCategory: HalachaLiving with a mistress as a default solution to a late single life
asked 6 years ago

Hello, Your Honor.
See, I have seen in literature that is mainly from the time of the Rishonim that there is an opening and permission for full married life when they are in the standard of concubines. Which of course take into account the laws of family purity.. or the concubine in this case.. Is it possible for even the strict and the opponents to hold on to the priority of this situation over the situation of sanctity, which is certainly shaken by the question of what a young man will do and not sin… or on the part of there being no righteous man in the land who will not sin. And the severity of the issue of chazel is great when it is in the original form in the Torah. We were outside the body of a woman. And in general, a single situation in our generation is possible in general the definition of anus? Etc. etc. The rest of the considerations and anchors in this. I thank you in advance for a systematic mishnah from a practical perspective and what is more lenient, since it is better for them to be shoggin or in permission and not in prohibition. Etc. Thank you


Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

0 Answers
מיכי Staff answered 6 years ago
It is difficult to permit married life without Kiddushin, because quite simply it is against Halacha. It is true that some have written that it is permissible to have sex with other people (like the Ya’abetz), but the issue is quite vague. Zvi Zohar dealt with it in his controversial (and very problematic) article in Akademot, and see Rabbi Shmuel Ariel’s response on the matter (I don’t think it was published in Akademot, but it can certainly be found online). I assume you can find materials and reviews online. But there is a general consideration here that I do not understand regarding the background to your question. If it is a permanent relationship – then why don’t you marry as a demigod, and not live in a mechanism of mistresses, which is certainly not the proper halakhic path? And if it is a casual relationship – then there are no mistresses here, and that is certainly forbidden. In short, I don’t see a possibility of allowing such a thing, unless there is a special situation that I haven’t thought of. “It would be better if there were more gullible people” doesn’t belong at all in a question like this, since I assume you don’t expect me to mislead you so that you will sin unintentionally. If you’re asking, you want to know and not be unintentionally.

Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

י.ד. replied 6 years ago

Divorced men and women who have already had a child and have had children sometimes have conditions that make it difficult to establish a new relationship. The children will not always accept the new partner well. Is it bad enough for them that their parents got divorced? Now they have to get used to new people? If someone wants to have another child with a new partner, then they are going to live with her anyway, so this is not a consideration. But if both parties do not want to have a child (or can no longer have a child), it is more convenient for them to remain friends than to expose them to the children and destroy the fragile coexistence that was created after the divorce. In this situation, I would not rule out the claim that this is a time of stress and to give them a chance with the Ramban method (as long as it is not ruled out in general by the halakhic law).

Gil Dahary replied 6 years ago

Maybe this could be a solution for a priest and a divorced woman.

מיכי Staff replied 6 years ago

https://www.akshiva.co.il/%D7%9E%D7%A2%D7%9E%D7%93-%D7%94%D7%90%D7%99%D7%A9%D7%94/%D7%9B%D7%94%D7%9F-%D7%95%D7%92%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%A9%D7%94-2/

Leave a Reply

Back to top button