logic
1 If A, then B, if B, then C, conclusion If A, then C,
Every a is a b, every b is a c, conclusion every a is a c,
Are these even deductions that are not from the general to the particular?
2 Why is an enthymeme part of the conclusion and not part of the premise, and then it is a deduction from the particular to the general? What is the connection, if any, between an enthymeme and abduction?
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
0 Answers
1. These are of course necessary arguments. They are also called deductions because of this, even though they do not go from the general to the particular. But this is just a semantic question.
2. An anathema is an assumption. That’s why I don’t understand your question.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
