May front
The GM learns the obligation to be killed and not to murder from a preconceived notion. Then she makes the inference for incest. Assuming that the learning of the inference also involves a preconceived notion, and not that the learning is predicated, how can one tap into this matter, since a preconceived notion is irrelevant to the issue of incest?
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
0 Answers
In contrast to the usual inference that we understand from the proximity of the verses, here the Torah itself makes the inference: For when a man rises up against another, so is this thing. Therefore, there is nothing to interpret here from interpretations. Even the usual inference is doubtful whether it can be interpreted. The proximity itself teaches this. We found interpretations only on logical inferences, that is, on the basis of the rabbinical and theological foundations.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
