Neuroscience

I assume you mean to ask how we know they are not like that. I have written about this at length, so I will answer briefly here. A. Who said that emotions are not the result of chemical processes? What does that mean? And even if they are the results of chemical processes, the question is what creates these processes themselves (perhaps the mind?). B. Emotions are not brain processes. This is just a conceptual error with no connection whatsoever to neuroscience or science in general. At most you can say that emotions are created by brain processes, but not identify them with each other. C. This is not the requested assumption, but an assumption. Don’t you have any assumptions in life? If this is the starting point for me, then for me the burden of proof is on those who oppose it. If they haven’t raised the burden of proof, then I stand by my position. This is really not the requested assumption, at least not in the sense of a fallacy.